Thursday, August 03, 2006

The Al Davis Comedy Hour

Welcome to the latest in our 32 part series, Better Know a Football Team.

If the NFL were Hollywood, the 2006 Oakland Raiders would be Snakes On A Plane. Every simpleton (even Sean Salisbury) knows that both are destined to fall flat on their faces, most likely in their opening weekends. At times both the Raiders and Snakes will range from uncomfortable to terrifying. More importantly to our cause, both projects have the potential for levels of humor not seen since the 1980 duo of the Raiders championship and Airplane!.

As always the story of Raider Nation begins with Al Davis, the League's resident hemmorhoid. The past three seasons have resulted in the Norvian average of 4.3 wins; once again the aged one spun the wheel of NFL coaches. Much like a contestant on The Price Is Right, Davis failed to complete a full spin on his first few tries and missed out on his top choices. With Bob Barker looking on the producers allowed the decrepit Davis to take a default, he was eventually able to retain Art Shell (you remember, he's the guy that replaced Mike Shanahan, and we all know how well that's going). He will soon go down as the first coach to begin his initial season on the hotseat.

For those who find the pathetic management of the front office too tragic to laugh at (pussies), I proudly present you Aaron Brooks. Mere words cannot do justice to the sheer majesty of Ron Mexico's cousin. Before we go further I'd like you to watch this YouTube clip as a friendly reminder of his exploits and future potential.

The bright spot of this franchise is the offensive talent surrounding their new play maker-upper. LaMont Jordan is a proven talent but he's yet to prove his longevity; combine that with a depth chart thinner than J.E. Skeets, and there could be trouble at times. The real strength comes from the speedy and sure-handed stable of receivers. Although Randy Moss is a pain in the ass he's got all the talent he needs to carry the offense... but more importantly he's got a smoothie franchise (I recommend the OG Kush).

Unfortunately for Brad Gilbert and any other Raider fans out there, Jerry Porter is already bitching about his new coach and his role on the team. His future in Oakland is currently in question. A popular option is last year's injury victim, Ronald Curry. Some of you may know him better as the best football/basketball combo that a Virginia high school has seen since AI's day. He went on to stab UVA in the back to play quarterback at UNC... where he sucked. Now he will try to join Porter to recreate the dynamic duo that outed Chump Bailey once and for all.

The defense was the obvious cause for concern in the offseason. Despite losing perennial underachiever/injury victim Charles Woodson the Raiders were able to shore up the beleaguered eleven by raiding the Rose Bowl rosters. They acquired two elite college safeties, Michael Huff of Texas and Darnell Bing of USC (apparently they will not be played by Hank Azaria and Matthew Perry despite what you may have heard). Thus far in minicamp the Raiders have been featuring Bing at outside linebacker, another defensive hole as of late.

Oakland is headed for a long season that will be rife with despair, truly the only ecstasy you'll find in that locker room will come from Sebastian Janikowski's stash pocket. Their best bet is to share that shit with the guys in the Black Hole and pray they don't riot.

Monday, July 31, 2006

Nites of the Roundtable: Volume 2

Post-Spring BlogPoll Roundtable brought to you by Burnt Orange Nation


Which offseason story are you most tired of, and, on the flip side, interested in? (e.g. Reggie Bush's house, Jimmy Clausen, etc.)

If I lived in a perfect place, besides the Porsche in my garage and the Kate Beckinsale in my bed, it would be taken as concrete fact that those who favor college football to the NFL were lovers of the highest caliber, blessed with immense intellect, a 98-mph fastball, the culinary skills to make bouillabaisse, and an ability to run the 100-meter dash in less than four seconds. First round selections in the Pro draft wouldn’t go as slowly as something Herman Melville wrote; Ron Jaworski’s talents would join Kirk Herbstreit’s; and the mouths of every NFL fan scolding my manliness for only paying attention to the games on Saturday would go silent, their lips locked around bottles of lukewarm Bud Light. But that is too ideal; too ideal for reality. Instead, smiling at the insignificant dysfunctions of the NFL rather than fighting to argue its more prominent frailties are the only solace I can find.

For that reason, the Reggie Bush situation was tolerable. For the past two years he was arguably the world’s most entertaining football player, and he was playing in college instead of the pros. More than anything, I look at it as the NCAA is giving damaged goods to the NFL. And, as the date of the events would have it (just a week prior to the draft), Bush was damaged in transit, not by the previous owner. Once he finished the Rose Bowl, he became the NFL’s problem. He was a booby-trapped gift – the Trojan Horse, if you will.

USC will be forced to figure its shit out eventually, but if someone told you ESPN manufactured the entire story just as an excuse to get Mel Kiper 20 minutes with an oxygen mask and a fresh bottle of Dasani, would you be that surprised? Essentially, instead of talking about how fat and lazy LenDale White was, you heard about how much trouble Reggie Bush was getting in. I’m pretty sure ESPN even showed us one of those patented camera shots, with Shelly Smith in the foreground, the Bush house in question in the background, and a few moving guys piling shit into a van in between. Because that’s the formula for “commotion”, obviously. (And to be honest, the most frustrating part about it was probably how the all of these roundtable discussions just had to be had concerning whether the situation affected Bush’s draft stock. You know, as if getting your parents into a nicer house made the best football talent since Barry Sanders – with much more marketability – a character-issues liability. I mean, people don’t hesitate to buy a Ferrari just because the previous owner got a speeding ticket with it.)

As for Lord Clausen, Ian nails it. Though for Michigan fans, it wasn’t so much the praise he got, but how little the other recruits got in comparison. Shit, Scout.com didn’t even think Clausen was the second best prospect in his class, and I think we all agree ESPN’s about one step from making a “Who Should Jimmy Take To The Prom?” poll on SportsNation. The way I look at it, if you’ve reached the point of hating something, why would you want that hatred to be tarnished? Just imagine if you found out the guy your girlfriend cheated on you with was blind and cured cancer in his spare time. So for me, the fact that Clausen’s virtually a clone of every douche bag I knew in high school does nothing but confirm Notre Dame’s predilection for things I don’t like.

Unless you’re a masochist, or a Penn State fan (which I guess is sort of the same thing) that just needs a reason to be angry, you don’t need to bother with oversaturated news content. I’d die if I had to read a thousand of these articles about Jeff Scja;kedizja being a first round baseball player (even though his ERA is poor (4.30), he has fewer strikeouts than innings pitched, and threw the most innings on the team, which rules out the “well he was too busy being an All-American receiver at the beginning of the baseball season” rebuttal) but I don’t have to acknowledge it if I don’t want.

As for what I am interested in, Erin Andrews’ rumored interest in being my girlfriend is a clear number one on the list. Well, most of that sentence is a lie, but I look at her and I see a girl I could fall in love with. Almost too much of that blond hair, enough confidence to blush on camera, an accidental charisma that sucks you like a time warp back to adolescence, and one of those voices you’d want to hear talking quietly to you before you fell asleep every night.

Hosted by Putfile.com

Two years ago when the Cardinals lost Game 5 of the NLCS to the Astros I saw a woman wearing grey pants standing at home plate. Jeff Kent had just hit a homerun off of Jason Isringhausen to win it in the bottom of the ninth, and the woman wanted to talk to him. You knew Jeff didn’t want to be standing on the field anymore – away from the girls he probably deserved, and the cigar smoke he wanted to inhale. And you could see it on his face, the “I’ll be there in a second” glance back at the dugout and the impatient smile that came with it. But then he finally turns toward the camera for a minute – all of that detonated firework smoke every movie in the 70s seemed to be filmed in hanging in front of his face – and it’s not Chris Myers holding the microphone up to his mouth. It’s the woman with grey pants, but she’s in focus now. It’s Erin Andrews. And she was never just one of those hired vixens who could enunciate well, either, but Erin Andrews. The kind of girl I would have held hands with for six months just to earn enough of her trust to kiss her for six minutes.

I guess she asked him a few questions or something after that, but for a short time, watching her lips move, I was almost a little jealous of Jeff Kent. I love the Cardinals almost enough to let them cause me as much pain as Michigan does every October, but I have to say, when Fox ended its telecast and started with the M.A.S.H reruns, it was Erin Andrews who I couldn’t stop thinking about.

The off-season story is her disappearance from my Saturdays, and how much I can't wait to see her when she comes back. Sideline reporters have 200 seconds per game to do their jobs, and more often than not you know whether they’re worth listening to within 10 of them. They have to be almost perfect, because when you’re watching them you’re not watching the game. They won’t win that fight. But with Erin, she never needed to win; she wasn’t fighting anything. She was a reason to watch.

Your head coach comes down with a mystery illness and has to step aside. You get to hand pick the replacement for the 2006 season. Who gets your vote?

Since this is purely a hypothetical and all, I’d take the stoicism of Lloyd Carr, the militaristic demeanor of Charlie Weis, the swagger of Urban Meyer, the tan of Chuck Amato, the ebullience of Rick Mangino, the audaciousness of Steve Spurrier, the reputation of Joe Paterno, the grandfatherly innocence of Bobby Bowden, the pantry of Phil Fulmer, the exuberance of Pete Carroll and the visor of Bob Stoops.

Coaches are always depicted as caricatures, whether out of sheer convenience on the part of frustrated fans, the coach’s own appreciation for actually having a defined persona, or in the case of a guy like Lloyd Carr, simply growing more stubborn and socially conservative with age. Bowden, Carr, Paterno and Mack Brown are of the Senior Citizen classification that – like the grandparent you respect too much to force into a nursing home – has a career of achievements that basically makes them invincible.

Pete Carroll hops around in his mock-turtle necks and windbreakers as the guy who 25 years ago would have been doing everything in his power to smoke someone else’s weed and get laid without making a next-day phone call. To me, I just envy that USC has a coach who really seems to fucking enjoy his job. When USC’s done winning a minimum of 11 games a year, Trojan fans may plead for an approach like Weis’s. Meyer is all business, but where is his passion? And Spurrier is damn-near flawless, but where is the part of him that realizes he isn’t?

I think that’s always been my biggest issue with Lloyd. Not that he nine wins is the best I can get, but that he doesn’t care enough to try and turn Lloyd Carr the Coach into someone who can give me more than that. Diversity and open-mindedness are not gimmicks.

Lastly, we'll mix the football and the blogging together here. If you could have anyone switch allegiances and start covering your team, who you gonna pick?

Ian, and the EDSBS boys are two of the best reads you’ll probably find anywhere – sports or otherwise – but I don’t know that they’re the kind best suited to cover Michigan. For that, I have to say the Bruins Nation. UCLA and Michigan are similar in a lot of ways, from their history, to their disliked coaches, to their second-class standing in conferences with powerhouses well ahead of each of them. It takes a lot of talent to capture the emotion wrought from underutilizing talent while getting your throats stepped on by your rivals. I think Nestor would do it right.

Saturday, July 29, 2006

Bon Voyage

Today is departure day for my brother and Dave...they are meeting up in Germany...and my cousin S from London is meeting them there....

Dave received the stash of stuff I sent for their crazy fun times during the games.. and he promised to take pictures of them wearing the wigs, facepaint, and all the hoopla...

I am jealous.

Dammit... but I am proud of them for going.

Driving home yesterday I chatted with my brother who just finished STEP III of his boards.. (WHOHOOO!), we reflected on the awesome sports events we've been to...from the NBA finals, to flying my mom out for Reggie Millers last game at the Garden, to me going to the Rose Bowl, to my brother flying out for the Angels World Series winning games 6 and 7....we've had some great memories...and hopefully more fun times to come... next year I'm getting tickets for the Final Four since they'll be played in Atlanta...and 2008 I'll hopefully be in China attending the Olympic games...

And in 4 years, i'll be done with all these damn exams and such, and will go to the World Cup... work hard, but play harder.

Monday, July 24, 2006

4th of july

Why do I always end up posting like four times in one day and then not at all for a week...

4th of July was fun. Drove the baby axliners to the rose bowl (for which I still am owed payment - what they don't know is I'm actually a highly paid, highly demanded [ok that goes in my own redundancy file] consultant, so they owe me $450 for my hour of effort. I'll be nice and hide it from the government so they don't have to pay taxes.) who then got to sit there for three hours before it actually started (suckers). Me and Ambrus and Cory and Bennett and Jeff went up the 2 to the second major turnout to watch all the fireworks in the area. It was ridiculous - everywhere we looked there were fireworks. I had my binoculars along and we could see them all the way out to the horizon. And we could read the writing on the buildings in downtown LA with them. This apparently fascinated Ambrus more than the fireworks themselves =p Anyway we watched a few hundred small shows for an hour until the rose bowl fireworks started, which were really big and bright from where we were, which was cool. Actually too big for the binocular field of view.

Then drove home and six of us went to set of a ton of fireworks that John bought outside walmart. That was really cool. We went just across the city line of Alhambra where it's legal and set them all off on a random residential street. Oh I love fire way too much. It was great.

And enough of this website for today.

Thursday, July 20, 2006

Guest Blogger on the Mexican Presidential Election

The story of the day, IMO, is the presidential election in Mexico. My knowledge of Mexico is entirely second or third hand, and mostly limited to what I read in the press and at various online sites. However, friend and TBV reader/commenter Tim D spends half his year in Mexico, and is not your regular gringo retiree/vacationer. He speaks and reads Spanish, and is a devoted political observer. So, I asked Tim to write what I hope will be the first of a series of pieces with his thoughts on the Mexican political scene. He was gracious enough to respond with these musings:---------------------------------------------------By far the best organized democratic election I have witnessed in my life was the 2005 gubernatorial election in the Mexican state of Guerrero. In the one week before the Sunday vote the two leading candidates (Torreblanca from the PRD party and Estudillo from the PRI) held rallies in Acapulco with the attendance for both rallies exceeding 100,000 persons.Can you imagine a candidate rally anywhere in the USA that would fill the Rose Bowl to standing room only? Now imagine Acapulco hosting two such rallies in one week.The entire city was energized. I watched in awe as the PRI pulled out all the stops for its candidate with a full-court press of high visibility media, neighborhood canvassing and street corner information booths. I was equally amazed at the grass-roots organization of the PRD that seemed to counter the PRI professionalism.The work of both parties (the PAN, Fox’s and Calderon’s party, pretty well sat out this state election) paid off in voter education and interest. Everyone I asked had an informed opinion about the election.People would tell you for whom they were voting, followed by a detailed explanation for their choice. I still recall listening to the political analysis by a maid in our building who succinctly listed the high points of both candidates’ platforms and then explained the reasoning for her vote. Seldom have I heard any American talk so rationally or so thoroughly about an election and its implications for the common good.I talked with business-owners, cab drivers and waitresses. Ask “Quien es mejor? Estudillo o Torreblanca?” and you would be treated to a ten-minute discussion about Guerrero and its future.On the morning of the election my jogging route took me past three polls. At one poll the line was nearly two blocks long at 8 a.m. When I saw the long lines I was thrilled for these democrats – and I was sad for my own country.I’m going on about this Mexican election because I sincerely believe most Americans haven’t a clue about how democracy is supposed to work. Nor have they any idea about what it means to be an “informed” voter or an active participant in the political process.Give up five hours to attend a political rally? Take the time to read all candidates positions on key issues? Stand in line for hours at a poll? Americans do these things out of their sense of duty or a sense of obligation to the future? I don’t think so.When it comes to a functioning democracy, present-day Mexico has it all over us.As I am writing this, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, the PRD candidate, is supposedly addressing a rally in Mexico City’s zocolo where he will demand a total recount of last Sunday’s ballots in Mexico’s presidential election. It is reported he will make his case by citing voting irregularities and by claiming political bias on the part of certain members of the Federal Election Commission. It is also reported he will seek a decision by Mexico’s Supreme Court that will demand a ballot-by-ballot recount.So what will Americans make of Lopez Obrador’s reluctance to accept the official vote? My short answer is this: it doesn’t matter what we will make of it; it only matters what the citizens of Mexico will make of it. And my informed guess is that the citizens of Mexico, with their deep hope and commitment to a transparent democracy, will take these charges of so-called election fraud far more seriously than we did in our own 2000 and 2004 elections.If my hunch is true and this challenge continues to play out in the coming months, then the American mass-media will continue its bungling record of accurate reporting. Already I’m seeing an active downplaying in our broadcast media of what’s happening in Mexico. We’re getting innocuous stories about President-elect Calderon’s position on the Border Fence (duh, he’s against it – as if any Mexican President would ever be for it) and a whole lot of stressing that Calderon is a “conservative.” Never mind that there’s a big difference between the conservatism of the PAN, Felipe Calderon’s party, and that of our Republican right-wing.I suspect the “official” response by the American media will be to treat Lopez Obrador as a “sore loser,” with lots of editorial calls for him to accept the official results like a “good sport.” But again I repeat: it’s not important what we or our media think of all of this. It’s only important what the Mexicans think about it.So if you can’t trust the American media to be either thorough or accurate about the situation in Mexico, where do you go if you want accurate reporting?Laura Carlsen, director of the International Relations Council’s Americas Program in Mexico City, has a good article at Commondreams.org which, though perhaps left-leaning, gives you most of the background and the rationale for Lopez Obrador’s dig-in-your-heels response.If you can read Spanish, then I’d lead you to three Mexico City dailies: El Universal, La Reforma and La Jornada. The websites for all three can be accessed through worldpress.org. (N.B. I find for the most complete and balanced information I must surf all three papers.)In my opinion, the only newspaper in the states that does an adequate job of Mexico reportage is the Miami Herald, largely because the Herald publishes the only English language daily in most of Latin America.Right now my thoughts and hopes are with the people of Mexico during this difficult time.--------------------------------------------------------To add to Tim's thoughts, I pass along a Guardian article from yesterday by Greg Palast: Mexico and Florida Have More In Common Than Heat.

Tuesday, July 18, 2006

Taking Bush is Texans' wise play

John Saraceno
USATODAY.com

"With the first pick in the 2006 NFL draft, the Houston Texans select ... "

Outgoing draft party host Paul Tagliabue plans to begin the intrigue in New York this month with those words. If new Texans head coach Gary Kubiak is as smart as he looked in Denver, he will prevail upon management, if need be, to complete the commissioner's sentence this way:

"Reggie Bush from the University of Southern California."

OK, so it won't be the most popular pick in Houston since the stampeding days of thundering Earl Campbell. Thousands of Longhorns fans and Texan season ticketholders will have a burr in their saddles over the snub of Rose Bowl MVP quarterback Vince Young, but so what? Drafting Bush not only is the safe decision. It is the logical, prudent one.

The Texans won the "Bush Sweepstakes" by nudging out the San Francisco 49ers. By trading down, or drafting a quarterback, they're tearing up a winning lottery ticket.

Reggie Bush might be the next ...

Barry Sanders.

Maybe Walter Payton.

Or a lethal combination.

Bush has now-you-see-him-now-you-don't elusiveness and deceptive power. This is not Rocket Ismail dragging his Heisman into the NFL. I'm already starting to feel sorry for Tony Dungy, Jack Del Rio and Jeff Fisher in the AFC South.

If you've ever spent time with Bush, you're impressed with his attitude, equanimity and desire to be the best. The stiff arm is pretty good, too.

Two days ago, the 5-10, 200-pounder auditioned with some former Trojans teammates at USC's "Pro Day" in front of more than 100 NFL personnel. The Trojan darter ran a 4.33 in the 40. He told reporters he was disappointed because, "I thought I could push a 4.29 out there."

Yeah, what a tortoise.

Bush also had the day's highest vertical leap (40.5 inches) and longest broad jump (10 feet, 8½ inches). When no one was looking — which would've been difficult because the workouts were watched by more than 1,000 fans and recruits — the running back ducked into a phone booth, changed clothes and put on his cape.

Seriously, when Bush removed his shirt, jaws dropped. He was ripped. He bench-pressed 225 pounds — 24 times. "I think I proved I should be the (first) pick," he said very convincingly.

The Texans could use Bush for muscle at the ticket window. They were 2-14 last season, following seasons of 7-9, 5-11 and 4-12. General manager Charley Casserly isn't on the hot seat, he's practically ablaze. Bush is his fire extinguisher.

Young offers potential upside and wonderful marketing opportunities for all of those hook-'em-'Horns faithful. Besides, quarterbacks are at a premium while running backs are plentiful. I mean, the Texans already have Domanick Davis and Vernand Morency in the backfield, right?

Sure. Call Canton.

Some keen observers believe that the Texans would be better off building their infrastructure along the offensive line, that drafting Bush is akin to installing a $10,000 stereo system in a '72 Vega.

While Bush was a man among boys at the collegiate level, he will be an equal in the NFL, even less so on a rebuilding team — or so goes the thinking. What good is a stud running back running behind a perpetually wanting O-line? After four seasons, quarterback David Carr still looks like an accident waiting to happen. He has been sacked 208 times — 68 last season.

The Texans recommitted to Carr in the offseason by exercising their option. They hope they solidified their offensive line by signing former Packers center Mike Flanagan. Kubiak will deploy the Broncos' zone-blocking scheme to run the ball more effectively and take pressure off Carr. And Tuesday they traded for three-time Pro Bowl receiver Eric Moulds. His presence should make a young receiving talent like Andre Johnson more dangerous.

Between now and draft day, all sorts of scenarios will be drawn up on the chalkboard. Theories will be expounded. Tables will be pounded. Mel Kiper will turn six shades of purple. I suppose some team could dangle some incredible whopper of a can't-turn-down-this-trade to the Texans. Many times, the best deal a team can make is the one they don't make.

Bush is scheduled to visit Houston on Thursday, where he plans to meet assistant coaches and spend time with owner Bob McNair. Young is supposed to work out for the team a day later. But if I'm Kubiak and Co., I'm playing Texas hold 'em.

At this juncture, Houston can have a Bush every Texan should be willing to call their own.

Monday, July 17, 2006

Residents' group moves to block vote on Pasadena's NFL bid

Revival of the city's bid for a National Football League team faces a challenge from residents who have filed suit to keep the city's Rose Bowl initiative off the November ballot.Pasadena First, a group of residents and preservationists organized to keep professional football out of the city, argued in a Superior Court motion Thursday that the ballot measure is "blatantly unconstitutional."

Fantasy Football 2006

The motion seeks a preliminary injunction. A tentative July 28 court hearing was scheduled. The November initiative, if passed, would give the NFL rights to play at the Rose Bowl for up to 55 years in exchange for a $500 million-plus renovation of the stadium and $500,000 annual rent.

Fantasy Football 2007

Pasadena First said it was illegal to negotiate a lease deal through the ballot box. Additionally, the group said the California Constitution explicitly prohibits the use of an initiative to impose terms on a private corporation. "Why go through a useless election when the thing is unenforceable?" Pasadena First chair Carolyn Naber asked.

Fantasy Football League

Councilman Chris Holden, chief sponsor of the ballot measure, said the legal move by Pasadena First is an attempt to thwart the will of the people. Pasadena First filed suit last year but let the matter sit idle until Holden qualified his measure for the ballot. "They should not be afraid to let the rest of the people in this community have a vote," Holden said. "I really like it if they would be able to see beyond their own special interests on this."

Fantasy Football


Information from Star-News